El desenvolupament espacial desigual com a lògica per entendre la desindustrialització i la regeneració urbana a les ciutats postindustrials europees
Resum
A finals de la dècada de 1960, i durant els següents vint anys, es va produir en moltes grans ciutats europees un procés de desindustrialització que va canviar el rumb d’aquestes ciutats per complet. Després del declivi econòmic, algunes d’aquestes ciutats van saber fer retornar el capital per tornar als cicles d’acumulació. Així doncs, pretenem entendre aquest procés de desindustrialització en el marc de les lògiques del desenvolupament desigual i les seves conseqüències posteriors sobre l’espai. Tractarem de comprendre com el ‘neoliberalisme realment existent’ actua sota els paràmetres de creació i destrucció fent de l’espai urbà un element productiu. L’objectiu és analitzar com els fluxos de capital fixen la seva productivitat espaciotemporal per fer ressorgir i rehabilitar les ciutats postindustrials europees recol·locant-les en el sistema de mercat mundial. D’altra banda, identifiquem la cristal·lització del desenvolupament espacial desigual (DED) en diferents dimensions socioespacials per tal d’entendre la complexitat pràctica mitjançant la qual s’estructura el mateix DED.
Paraules clau
desindustrialització, producció espacial, desenvolupament espacial desigual, dimensions socioespacialsReferències
AMIN, Samir (1985). La acumulación a escala mundial. Crítica de la teoría del subdesarrollo. México, D.F: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.
AMIN, Samir (1989). Maldevelopment. Anatomy of a Global Failure. Dakar: Pambazuca Press.
BELL, Daniel (1976). The coming of post-industrial society. New York: Basic Books. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131727609336501
BLANCO, Ismael and SUBIRATS, Joan (2008). “Social exclusion, area effects and metropolitan governance: a comparative analysis of five large Spanish cities”. Urban Research & Practice, 1 (2), 130-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535060802169823
BRENNER, Neil (1998). “Between Fixity and Motion: Accumulation, Territorial Organization and the Historical Geography of Spatial Scales”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 16 (4), 459-481. https://doi.org/10.1068/d160459
BRENNER, Neil (2004). New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199270057.001.0001
BRENNER, Neil (2009). “A thousand leaves: notes on the geographies of uneven development”. In: KEIL, Roger and MAHON, Rianne (Eds.). Leviathan Undone? Towards a Political Economy of Scale. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 27-51.
BRENER, Neil and THEODORE, Nik (2002). “Cities and the geographies of ‘actually existing neoliberalism’”. Antipode, 34 (4), 349-379. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444397499.ch1
BRENNER, Neil; JESSOP, Bob; JONES, Martin and MACLEOD, Gordon (2003). State/Space. Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470755686
CASTELLS, Manuel (1999). La era de la información: Economía, sociedad y cultura. Vol. 1. La sociedad red. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
CHISHOLM, George Goudie (1889). Handbook of commercial geography. London: Longmans.
CLARK, Eric (1995). “The Rent Gap Re-examined”. Urban Studies, 32 (9), 1489-1503.
COHEN, Stephen and ZYSMAN, John (1988). Manufacturing matters: The myth of the post- industrial economy. New York: Basic Books.
COLLINGE, Chris (1999). “Self-organization of society by scale: a spatial reworking of regulation theory”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 17 (5), 557-574. https://doi.org/10.1068/d170557
COX, Kevin (1990). “Territorial structures of the state: some conceptual issues”. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 81 (4), 251-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9663.1990.tb01325.x
COX, Kevin (2002). Political Geography: Territory, State and Society. Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470693629
DE SOUSA, Boaventura (2009). Una epistemología del Sur: La reinvención del conocimiento y la emancipación social. México: Siglo XXI. Clacso
DÍAZ, Isabel (2016). “Sevilla 1929-1992. La producción de una mercancía”. In: GRUPO DE ESTUDIOS ANTROPOLÓGICOS LA CORRALA (Coord.). Cartografía de la ciudad capitalista: Transformación urbana y conflicto social en el Estado español. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.
DUNFORD, Mick and KAFKALAS, Grigoris (1992). Cities and regions in the new Europe: The global-local interplay and spatial development strategies. London: Belhaven Press.
FRANQUESA, Jaume (2007). “Vaciar y llenar, o la lógica espacial de la neoliberalización”. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas (REIS), 1 (118), 123-150. https://doi.org/10.2307/40184799
GHERTNER, D. Asher (2015). “Why gentrification theory fails in ‘much of the world’”. City, 19 (4), 552-563. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1051745
GOIKOETXEA, Jule (2018). Privatizar la democracia: Capitalismo global, política europea y Estado español. Barcelona: Icaria.
GÓMEZ, María Victoria (2008). La Metamorfosis de la ciudad industrial: Glasgow y Bilbao: dos ciudades con un mismo recorrido. Madrid: Talasa.
HALL, Tim and HUBBARD, Phill (1996). “The Entrepreneurial City: New Urban Politics, New Urban Geographies”. Progress in Human Geography, 20 (2), 153-174.
HARDT, Michael and NEGRI, Antonio (2002). Imperio. Barcelona: Paidós.
HARPER, Earl (2016). “Ecological Gentrification, Post-Politics and Fetishism”. International Conference From Contested_Cities To Global Urban Justice, Bristol, Uk.
HARVEY, David (1985). The Urbanization of Capital: Studies in the History and Theory of Capitalist Urbanization. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
HARVEY, David (2003). Espacios de Esperanza. Madrid: Akal.
HARVEY, David (2004). El nuevo imperialismo. Madrid: Akal.
HARVEY, David (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199283262.001.0001
HARVEY, David (2006). Spaces of Global Capitalism. Towards a Theory of Uneven Geographic Development. London: Verso.
HARVEY, David (2014). Seventeen contradictions and the end of capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
HARVEY, David (2019). La lógica geográfica del capitalismo. Barcelona: Icaria.
JESSOP, Bob (1992). “Post-Fordism and flexible specialization: contradictory, complementary, commensurable, or simply different perspectives?”. In: HUIB, Ernest and MEYER, Verena (Eds.). Flexible Specialization and the New Regionalism. London: Pinter, 25-44.
JESSOP, Bob (1998). “The narrative of enterprise and the enterprise of narrative: place marketing and the entrepreneurial city”. In: HALL, Tim and HUBBARD, Phill (Eds.). The Entrepreneurial City. Chichester: Willey.
JESSOP, Bob (2000). “Globalization, Entrepreneurial Cities and The Social Economy”. In: HAMEL, Pierre; LUSTIGER-THALER, Mark and MAYER, Margit (Eds.). Urban Movements in Globalising World. London and New York: Routledge, 81-100.
JESSOP, Bob (2006). “Spatial Fixes, Temporal Fixes and Spatio-Temporal Fixes”. In: CASTREE, Noel and GREGORY, Derek (Eds.). David Harvey: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 142-166. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470773581.ch8
JESSOP, Bob (2009). “Avoiding traps, rescaling states, governing Europe”. In: KEIL, Rianne and MAHON, Roger (Eds.). Leviathan undone? towards a political economy of scale. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 87-104.
JESSOP, Bob (2017). El Estado: Pasado, presente, futuro. Madrid: Los Libros de la Catarata.
JESSOP, Bob; PECK, Jamie y TICKELL, Adam (1999). Retooling the machine: state restructuring, uneven development, and urban politics. In: JONAS, Andrew E. G. and WILSON, David (Eds.). The urban growth machine: critical perspectives two decades later. New York: State University of New York Press, 141-159.
JONES, Martin and JESSOP, Bob (2010). “Thinking state/space incompossibly”. Antipode, 42 (5), 1119-1149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00796.x
KEUCHEYAN, Razmig (2013). The left hemisphere: Mapping critical theory today. London: Verso Books.
LEFEBVRE, Henri (1970). La révolution urbaine. Paris: Gallimard.
LEFEBVRE, Henri (1974). La production de l’espace. Paris: Anthropos. https://doi.org/10.3406/homso.1974.1855
LIPIETZ, Alain (1982). “Towards global Fordism”. New Left Review, 2 (132), 33-47.
LIPIETZ, Alain (1996). “Warp, woof and regulation: A tool for social science”. In: BENKO, Georges and STOHMAYER, Ulf (Eds.). Space and Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 250-283.
LOGAN, John and MOLOTCH, Harvey Luskin (1987). Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley: University of California Press.
LÓPEZ, Isidro and RODRÍGUEZ, Emmanuel (2010). Fin de Ciclo. Financiarización, territorio y sociedad en la onda larga del capitalismo hispano (1959-2010). Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.
LÓPEZ, Isidro and RODRÍGUEZ, Emmanuel (2013). “Competitividad territorial y circuito secundario de acumulación”. In: OBSERVATORIO METROPOLITANO (Eds.). Paisajes Devastados. Después del ciclo inmobiliario: impactos regionales y urbanos de la crisis. Madrid: Traficantes de sueños, 25-75.
LUXEMBURG, Rosa (1933). La acumulación del capital. Estudio sobre la interpretación económica del imperialismo. Madrid: Cenit.
MARCUSE, Herbert (1964). One-dimensional man. Boston: Beacon Press.
MASSEY, Doreen (1984). Spatial divisions of labour: Social structures and the geography of production. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
MASSEY, Doreen (1994). Space, place and gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.
MASSEY, Doreen (2009). “Concepts of space and power in theory and in political practice”. Documents d’Anàlisi Geogràfica, 55, 15-26.
MASSEY, Doreen and MEEGAN, Richard (1978). “Industrial restructuring versus the cities”. Urban Studies, 15 (3), 273-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/713702404
O’CONNOR, Justin and GU, Xin (2010). “Developing a Creative Cluster in a Postindustrial City: CIDS and Manchester”. The Information Society, 26 (2), 124-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240903562787
PECK, Jamie (2000). “Places of work”. In: SHEPPARD, Eric and BARNES, Trevor. A companion to economic geography. Oxford: Blackwell, 133-149.
PECK, Jamie and TICKELL, Adam (1994). “Jungle Law Breaks out: Neoliberalism and Global- Local Disorder”. Area, 26 (4), 317-326.
PECK, Jamie and WARD, Kevin (2006). City of revolution: Restructuring Manchester. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
PLÖGER, Jörg (2013). “Comeback Cities? Urban Recovery Approaches in European Industrial Cities”. In: ZIMMERMANN, Clemens (Ed). Industrial Cities: History and Future. Frankfurt / New York: Campus Verlag.
REMY, Jean (2000). La ville: Phénomène économique. Paris: Anthropos.
ROBERTSON, Douglas (1998). Pulling in opposite directions: the failure of post war planning to regenerate Glasgow. Planning Perspectives, 13, 1-15.
ROY, Ananya (2016). “Who’s Afraid of Postcolonial Theory?”. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40 (1), 200-209. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12274
SAEGER, Steven (1997). “Globalization and deindustrialization: Myth and reality in the OECD”. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 133, 580-608. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707404
SASSEN, Saskia (1996). Losing control?: Sovereignty in an age of globalization. New York: Columbia University Press.
SEMI, Giovanni (2004). “Il quartiere che (si) distingue. Un caso di ‘gentrification’ a Torino”. Studi culturali, Rivista quadrimestrale, 1, 83-108. https://doi.org/10.1405/13254
SEMI, Giovanni (2019). Cosa succede a Torino?. Un’assemblea pubblica per discutere su diritti, decoro, derive securitarie e gestione dell’ordine pubblico, a Torino come altrove. Luigi Einaudi di Torino.
SEVILLA-BUITRAGO, Álvaro (2015). “Capitalist Formations of Enclosure: Space and the Extinction of the Commons”. Antipode, 47 (4), 999-1020. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12143
ŠKUFLIĆ, Lorena and DRUŽIĆ, Marko (2016). “Deindustrialisation and productivity in the EU”. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 29 (1), 991-1002. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2016.1235505
SMITH, Neil (1979). “Toward a theory of gentrification: a back to the city movement by capital, not by people”. Journal of the American Planning Association, 45 (4), 538-548. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944367908977002
SMITH, Neil (1984). Uneven development: nature, capital and production of space. New York: Blackwell.
SMITH, Neil (1995). “Remaking scale: competition and cooperation in prenational and postnational Europe”. In: ESKELINEN, Heikki and SNICKARS, Folke (Eds.). Competitive European Peripheries. Berlin: Springer, 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79955-6_4
SMITH, Neil (2006). “The Geography of Uneven Development”. In: DUNN, Bill and RADICE, Hugo (Eds.). 100 years of permanent revolution: Results and prospects. London: Pluto Press, 180-195.
SOJA, Edward (1989). Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. London: Verso.
SOJA, Edward (2000). Postmetropolis: Critical studies of cities and regions. Oxford: Blackwell.
SWYNGEDOUW, Erik (1997). “Neither global nor local: ‘glocalization’ and the politics of scale”. In: COX, Kevin (Ed.). Spaces of Globalization: Reasserting the Power of the Local. New York: Guilford Press.
TAIBÓ, Carlos (2016). Para entender el TTIP: Una visión crítica del Acuerdo Transatlántico de Comercio e Inversiones. Madrid: Catarata.
TELLERIA, Imanol and LEKUE, Iago (2020). “Las ciudades en tiempos de re-escalamiento: movimientos urbanos, participación y modos de gobernanza”. In: ALONSO, María Rosario; DE GREGORIO, Sonia and GONZÁLEZ, Moneyba (Eds.). Las agendas urbanas y el gobierno de las ciudades: Transformaciones, Desafíos e Instrumentos. Madrid: Reus.
WACQUANT, Loïc (2008). Urban outcasts: A comparative sociology of advanced marginality. Cambridge: Polity.
WEBER, Rachel (2002). “Extracting value from the city: neoliberalism and urban redevelopment”. Antipode, 34 (3), 519-540. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444397499.ch8
Publicades
Com citar
Descàrregues
Drets d'autor (c) 2022 Iago Lekue López
Aquesta obra està sota una llicència internacional Creative Commons Reconeixement-NoComercial 4.0.
