Cuando el espacio conceptualizado se encuentra con el espacio vivido. Los proyectos territoriales de desarrollo como complejos procesos de «traducción»

Brice de Reymaeker

doi:10.5565/rev/dag.199

When the designed space meets the lived space. The territorial development projects as complex processes of «translation»

Authors

Brice de Reymaeker Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Departament de Geografia

PDF (ES)

Abstract

In the present article the theoretical lines and the successive methodological proposals that guide my attempt to study the projects of cooperation for territorial development, under a geographic approach inspired by social constructivism, are presented. After presenting those projects like dynamic wholes in relation between themselves of spatial conceptions, practices and representations, different essential contributions of postcolonial and feminist geography as well as of the no representational perspective are reviewed. In fact those contributions may serve as departure point for the conceptualization, in a more subtle way, of the process of translation or negotiation that occurs not only between the different actors engaged in the territorial development projects but also between their different conceived, perceived and lived spaces.

Keywords

cooperation for territorial development, process of translation, apparatus of knowledge-power, Lefebvre.

References

Blunt, Alison (1994). «Mapping authorship and authority: Reading Mary Kingsley’s Landscape Descriptions». En: Blunt, Alison y Rose, Gillian (eds.). Writing women and space: Colonial and Postcolonial Geographies. Nueva York y Londres: The Guilford Press, 51-72.

Blunt, Alison y Rose, Gillian (1994). «Introduction: Women’s Colonial and postcolonial Geographies». En: Blunt, Alison y Rose, Gillian (eds.). Writing women and space: Colonial and Postcolonial Geographies. Nueva York y Londres: The Guilford Press, 1-25.

Calderón Vázquez, F.J. (2008). Guía de orientaciones para la evaluación y seguimiento de proyectos de desarrollo. Edición electrónica gratuita. Texto completo en www.eumed.net/libros/2008b/411/.

Castro, Edgardo (2006). «Michel Foucault: sujeto e historia». Tópicos, 14, 171-183. [http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1666-48X2006000100008&lng=es&nrm=iso; consulta: 25 de abril 2010]

Deleuze, Gilles y Guattari, Félix (1972). L’Anti-Oedipe: capitalisme et schizophrénie. París: Les Éditions de Minuit.

Dreyfus, Hubert L. y Rabinow, Paul (1982). Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and Hermeneutics. Brighton: The Hervester Press Limited.

Fairclough, Norman (2003). Analysing Discourse. Textual analysis for social researcher. Londres y Nueva York: Routledge.

Fish, Stanley (1980). Is there a text in this class?: The authority of interpretative communities. Cambridge y Londres: Harvard University Press.

Garfinkel, Harold (1967). Studies in Ethnometodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Gómez Galán, M. y Sáinz Ollero, H. (2003). El ciclo del proyecto de cooperación al desarrollo. La aplicación del marco lógico. Madrid: CYAN, SA.

Gregory, Derek (2000). «Edward Said’s imaginative geographies». En: Crang, Mike y Thrift, Nigel (eds.). Thinking Space. Londres: Routledge, 302-348.

Jäger, Siegfried (2001). «Discurso y conocimiento: aspectos teóricos y metodológicos de la crítica del discurso y del análisis de dispositivos». En: Wodak, Ruth y Meyer, Michael (comps.). Métodos de análisis crítico del discurso. Barcelona: Gedisa, 61-100.

Jones, Owen (2008) «Stepping from the wreckage: Geography, pragmatism and antirepresentational theory». Geoforum, 39, 1600-1612.

Keller, Reiner (2005). «Analysing Discourse. An aproach From sociology of Knowledge». Forum Qualitative Socialforshung, 6 (3). [http://www.qualitativeresearch.net/fqs-texte/3-05/05-3-32-e.htm; consulta: 14 de marzo de 2010]

Latham, Alan (2003). «Research, performance, and doing human geography: some reflections on the diary-photograph, diary interview method». Environment and Planning A, 35, 1993-2017.

Latour, Bruno (1996). Aramis or the love of technology. Cambridge y Londres: Harvard University Press.

Latour, Bruno (2005). Reassembling the Social. An introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Nueva York: Oxford University Press Inc.

Lefebvre, Henri (1974). La production de l’espace. París: Anthropos.

Lees, Loretta (2004). «Urban geography: discourse analysis and urban research». Progress in Human Geography, 28 (1), 101-107.

Maharaj, Brij y Narsiah, Sagie (2005). «La nouvelle géographie régionale de l’Afrique du Sud post-apartheid». En: Antheaume, Benoît y Giraut, Frédérique (eds.). Le territoire est mort. Vive les territoires! Une (re)fabrication au nom du développement. París: IRD Éditions, 79-107.

Massey, Doreen (2003) «Imagining the field». En: Pryke, M.; Rose, G. y Whatmore, S. (eds.). Using Social Theory. Thinking through Research. Londres: Sage Publications Ltd., 71-88.

Mawdsley, Emma; Townsend, Janet; Porter, Gina y Oakley, Peter (2002). Knowledge, power and development agendas: NGOs North and South. Oxford: INTRAC.

Meyer, Michael (2001). «Entre la teoría, el método y la política: la ubicación de los enfoques relacionados con el ACD». En: Wodak, Ruth y Meyer, Michael (comps.). Métodos de análisis crítico del discurso. Barcelona: Gedisa, 35-59.

Mills, Sara (2005). Gender and Colonial Space. Manchester y Nueva York: Manchester University Press.

Mohanty, Chandra Talpade (2003 [1988]). «Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses». En: Lewis, Reina y Mills, Sara (eds.). Feminsist Postcolonial Theory: A Reader. Edimburgo: Edinburgh University Press Ltd., 49-74.

Netto, Vinicius (2008). «Practice, space and the duality of meaning». Environment and Planning D, 26 (2), 359-379.

Painter, Joe (2000). «Pierre Bourdieu». En: Crang, Mike y Thrift, Nigel (eds.). Thinking Space. Londres: Routledge, 239-259.

Peemans, J-P. y De Rijck, K. (2004). Mobilité et paysage: les rapports entre espaces urbains, périurbains et ruraux: convergences et divergences des regards du développement et de l’urbanisme. Presses Universitaires de Louvain.

Reiss, Timothy J. (1982). The discourse of modernity. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Retaillé, Denis (2005). «L’espace mobile». En: Antheaume, Benoît y Giraut, Frédérique (eds.). Le territoire est mort. Vive les territoires! Une (re)fabrication au nom du développement. París: IRD Éditions, 175-201.

Retaillé, Denis (2007) «Quel est l’impacte de la mondialisation sur le développement local?». Les Cahiers d’Outre-Mer, 238, 167-183.

Rich, Adrienne (2003 [1983]). «Notes towards a Politics of Location». En: Lewis, Reina y Mills, Sara (eds.). Feminsist Postcolonial Theory: A Reade. Edimburgo: Edinburgh University Press Ltd., 29-42.

Robinson, Jenny (2000). «Feminism and the spaces of transformation». Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 25 (3), 285-301.

Rose, Gillian (1993). Feminism and Geography: The Limits of Geographical Knowledge. Mineapolis: University of Mineapolis Press.

Rose, Gillian; Degen, Monica y Basdas, Begum (2010). «More on “big things”: building events and feelings». Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35, 334-349.

Said, Edward W. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.

Said, Edward W. (1983). The world, the text, and the critic. Londres: Harvard University Press.

Said, Edward W. (1993). Culture and Imperialism. Nueva York: Knopf.

Smith, Richard G. (2003). «Baudrillard’s nonrepresentational theory: burn the signs and journey without maps». Environment and Planning D, 21 (1), 64-84.

Thrift, Nigel (1996). Spatial Formations. Londres: Sage.

Thrift, Nigel y Dewsbury, John-David (2000). «Dead geographies —and how to make them live». Environnement and Planning D, 18 (4), 411-432.

Yapa, Lakshman (1997). «Reply: Why Discourse Matter, Materiality». Annals of Association of American Geographers, 87 (4), 717-722.