Las subjetividades eróticas del investigador/a: retos epistemológicos y éticos

Autores/as

Resumen

Este artículo pretende profundizar en la cuestión de la relevancia potencial y la importancia de incluir reflexiones sobre el deseo y la sexualidad de la persona que investiga en los resultados de su investigación. Analizamos críticamente la excepcionalización de las interacciones sexual(izada)s en la investigación: ¿cuáles son las razones por las que el contacto sexual(izado) entre la persona que investiga y las personas participantes se considera no ético o problemático, y cuáles son las consecuencias del hecho de evitar la intimidad —o la (auto)censura en relación con la discusión— en el trabajo de campo? Este debate nos lleva a defender una aproximación ética alternativa a la prescrita por los protocolos éticos institucionales. La aproximación ética que planteamos se basa en la premisa de que la producción de conocimiento nunca se da fuera de nuestros cuerpos y que la relación de investigación no es fundamentalmente diferente a ningún otro tipo de relación. Lo que proponemos es una ética relacional de la investigación que cree espacios para el debate abierto y en diálogo con otras personas sobre las consecuencias (potenciales) de nuestras acciones como investigadores/as/seres humanos en unas relaciones de asimetría de poder cambiantes.

Palabras clave

geografías de las sexualidades, reflexividad, ética de la investigación, investigador/a, subjetividad sexual

Citas

ABRAMSON, Allen (1993). “Between autobiography and method: Being male, seeing myth and the analysis of structures of gender and sexuality in the eastern interior of Fiji”. In: BELL, Diane; CAPLAN, Pat and KARIM, Wazir J. (eds.). Gendered Fields: Women, Men and Ethnography. London: Routledge, 63-77.

BELL, David J. (1995). “[Screw]ing geography (censor’s version)”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 13, 127-131. https://doi.org/10.1068/d130127

BELL, Susan E. (2002). “Sexualizing research: Response to Erich Goode”. Qualitative Sociology, 25 (4), 535-539. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021067000221

BLIDON, Marianne (2012). Géographie de la sexualité ou sexualité du géographe? Quelques leçons autour d’une injonction. Paper presented at the Annales de géographie.

BOURDIEU, Pierre (2004). Science of Science and Reflexivity. Cambridge: Polity.

BRAIDOTTI, Rosi (2006). Affirmation versus vulnerability: On contemporary ethical debates. Paper presented at the Symposium.

BRAIDOTTI, Rosi (2008). “Affirmation, Pain and Empowerment”. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 14 (3), 7-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/12259276.2008.11666049

CLIMO, Jacob (1999). “A memory of intimacy in liminal space”. In: MARKOWITZ, Fran and ASHKENAZI, Michael (eds.). Sex, Sexuality, and the Anthropologist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 43-56.

CUPPLES, Julie (2002). “The field as a landscape of desire: sex and sexuality in geographical fieldwork”. Area, 34 (4), 382-390. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4762.00095

DE CRAENE, Valerie (2017). “Fucking geographers! Or the epistemological consequences of neglecting the lusty researcher’s body”. Gender, Place & Culture, 24 (3), 449-464. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2017.1314944

DE GRAEVE, Katrien (accepted). “Beyond the crazy ex-girlfriend: Drawing the contours of a radical vulnerability”. Sexualities.

ELLIS, Carolyn (2007). “Telling Secrets, Revealing Lives: Relational Ethics in Research with Intimate Others”. Qualitative Inquiry, 13 (1), 3-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406294947

GILSON, Erinn (2013). The Ethics of Vulnerability: A Feminist Analysis of Social Life and Practice. New York: Taylor & Francis.

GOODE, Erich (1999). “Sex with informants as deviant behavior: An account and commentary”. Deviant Behavior, 20 (4), 301-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/016396299266416

HARAWAY, Donna (1988). “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective”. Feminist Studies, 14 (3), 575-599.

HARDING, Sandra (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

HARDING, Sandra (1992). “Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is ‘strong objectivity’?”. The Centennial Review, 36 (3), 437-470.

HARITAWORN, Jin; LIN, Chin-ju and KLESSE, Christian (2006). “Poly/logue: A Critical Introduction to Polyamory”. Sexualities, 9 (5), 515-529. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460706069963

HASTRUP, Kirsten (1995). A Passage to Anthropology: Between Experience and Theory. New York: Routledge.

HERVIK, Peter (1994). “Shared reasoning in the field: Reflexivity beyond the author”. In: HASTRUP, Kirsten and HERVIK, Peter (eds.). Social Experience and Anthropological Knowledge. London: Routledge, 78-100.

hooks, bell (2004). The Will to Change: Men, Masculinity, and Love. New York: Atria Books.

KILLICK, Andrew P. (1995/2003). “The penetrating intellect: on being white, straight, and male in Korea”. In: KULICK, Don and WILLSON, Margaret (eds.). Taboo: Sex, Identity and Erotic Subjectivity in Anthropological Fieldwork. London: Routledge, 76-106.

KLESSE, Christian (2014). “Poly Economics—Capitalism, Class, and Polyamory”. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 27 (2), 203-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-013-9157-4

KRIEGER, Susan (1991). Social Science and the Self: Personal Essays on an Art Form. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

KULICK, Don and WILLSON, Margaret (1995/2003). Taboo: Sex, Identity and Erotic Subjectivity in Anthropological Fieldwork. London: Taylor & Francis.

LERUM, Kari (2001). “Subjects of Desire: Academic Armor, Intimate Ethnography, and the Production of Critical Knowledge”. Qualitative Inquiry, 7 (4), 466-483. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040100700405

LONGHURST, Robyn (1995). “The Body and Geography”. Gender, Place & Culture, 2 (1), 97-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/09663699550022134

LONGHURST, Robyn (2004). Bodies: Exploring Fluid Boundaries. Abingdon: Routledge.

LONGHURST, Robyn and JOHNSTON, Lynda (2014). “Bodies, gender, place and culture: 21 years on”. Gender, Place & Culture, 21 (3), 267-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2014.897220

MOHANTY, Chandra T. (1991). “Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses”. In: MOHANTY, Chandra T.; RUSSO, Ann and TORRES, Lourdes (eds.). Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 52-80.

NASH, Catherine J. and BAIN, Alison (2007). “‘Reclaiming raunch’? Spatializing queer identities at Toronto women’s bathhouse events”. Social & Cultural Geography, 8 (1), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360701251809

NEWTON, Esther. (1993). “My best informant’s dress: The erotic equation in fieldwork”. Cultural Anthropology, 8 (1), 3-23.

OKELY, Judith (2001). “Anthropology and autobiography: Participatory experience and embodied knowledge”. In: CALLAWAY, Helen and OKELY, Judith (eds.). Anthropology and Autobiography. London: Routledge, 1-28.

RABINOW, Paul (1977). Reflections on Fieldwork in Morocco. Berkeley: University of California Press.

ROBINSON, Victoria (1997). “My baby just cares for me: Feminism, heterosexuality and non‐Monogamy”. Journal of Gender Studies, 6 (2), 143-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.1997.9960678

ROSE, Gillian (1997). “Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics”. Progress in Human Geography, 21 (3), 305-320. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913297673302122

SAGUY, Abigail C. (2002). “Sex, inequality, and ethnography: Response to Erich Goode”. Qualitative Sociology, 25 (4), 549-556. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021071101130

SALAMONE, Frank A. (1999). “‘Oh, there you are!’: sex and the heterosexual anthropologist”. In: MARKOWITZ, Fran and ASHKENAZI, Michael (eds.). Sex, Sexuality, and the Anthropologist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 57-74.

SPARKES, Andrew C. (2002). “Auto-ethnography: self-indulgence or something more?” In: BOCHNER, Arthur P. and ELLIS, Carolyn (eds.). Ethnographically Speaking: Autoethnography, Literature, and Aesthetics. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press, 209-232.

VANDERBECK, Robert M. (2005). “Masculinities and Fieldwork: Widening the discussion”. Gender, Place & Culture, 12 (4), 387-402. https://doi.org/10.1080/09663690500356537

WADE, Peter (1993). “Sexuality and masculinity in fieldwork among Colombian blacks”. In: BELL, Diane; CAPLAN, Pat and WAZIR, J. Karim (eds.). Gendered Fields: Women, Men and Ethnography. London: Routledge, 199-214.

WEKKER, Gloria (2006). The Politics of Passion: Women’s Sexual Culture in the Afro-Surinamese Diaspora. New York: Columbia University Press.

WHITEHEAD, Tony L. (1986). “Breakdown, resolution and coherence: the fieldwork experiences of a big, brown, pretty-talking man in a West Indian community”. In: WHITEHEAD, Tony L. and CONAWAY, Mary E. (eds.). Self, Sex, and Gender in Cross-Cultural Fieldwork. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 213-239.

WILLEY, Angela (2016). Undoing Monogamy: The Politics of Science and the Possibilities of Biology. Durham: Duke University Press.

WILLIAMS, Christine L. (2002). “To know me is to love me? Response to Erich Goode”. Qualitative Sociology, 25 (4), 557-560. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021023217968

WINKELMAN, Michael (1999). “Cross-cultural social-sexual adaptations in fieldwork: Perspectives from Mexican field settings”. In: MARKOWITZ, Fran and ASHKENAZI, Michael (eds.). Sex, Sexuality, and the Anthropologist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 75-79.

Biografía del autor/a

Katrien De Graeve, Ghent University

Centre for Research on Culture and Gender. Department of Languages and Cultures

Valerie De Craene, KU Leuven. Division of Geography and Tourism. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Free University of Brussels (VUB), Cosmopolis

Valerie De Craene is a doctoral researcher in Social Geography affiliated to the Division of Geography and Tourism, KU Leuven (Belgium) and a researcher at the Research Policy Centre Housing affiliated to Cosmopolis, Free University Brussels (VUB, Belgium). Her main research interests include geography of gender and sexuality, the territoriality of housing and social exclusions, and Slow Science. She is also an editor of AGORA.

Publicado

28-06-2019

Cómo citar

De Graeve, K., & De Craene, V. (2019). Las subjetividades eróticas del investigador/a: retos epistemológicos y éticos. Documents d’Anàlisi Geogràfica, 65(3), 587–601. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/dag.578

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.