Prácticas cartográficas para una geografía feminista: los mapas como herramientas críticas
Resumen
Los cambios tecnológicos y conceptuales experimentados por la cartografía y los sistemas de información geográfica (SIG) en las últimas décadas han redefinido el papel y las posibilidades de los mapas como herramientas de investigación. En este artículo analizamos las contribuciones producidas en el contexto de las geografías feministas para recalibrar el papel y el potencial de las representaciones cartográficas actuales. Por un lado, sus propuestas han logrado afirmar la necesidad de adoptar una posición reflexiva hacia los mapas, tanto en el momento de su producción como en su uso y efectos. Por otro lado, la apropiación de estas tecnologías cartográficas desde posiciones feministas ha logrado transformar las prácticas cartográficas de manera aplicada y estratégica. Al convertirlas en tecnologías compatibles con sus principios, contienen un enorme potencial para toda persona o colectivo que utilice los mapas y los SIG como herramientas críticas y emancipadoras.Palabras clave
SIG cualitativo, visualización feminista, cartografía crítica, reflexividad, geografía feministaCitas
AEMP (2018). Handbook by The Anti-Eviction Mapping Project (AEMP). Creating Social Change Through Creativity. Nueva York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52129-9_16
BARNES, Trevor J. (2009). «“Not Only… but Also”: Quantitative and Critical Geography». The Professional Geographer, 61 (3), 292-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330120902931937
BENACH, Núria (2017). William Bunge: Las Expediciones Geográficas Urbanas. Barcelona: Icaria.
BONDI, Liz y DOMOSH, Mona (1992). «Other Figures in Other Places: On Feminism, Postmodernism and Geography». Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 10 (2), 199-213. https://doi.org/10.1068/d100199
BOSCHMANN, E. Eric y CUBBON, Emily (2014). «Sketch Maps and Qualitative GIS: Using Cartographies of Individual Spatial Narratives in Geographic Research». The Professional Geographer, 66 (2), 236-248. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2013.781490
BROWN, Michael y KNOPP, Larry (2006). «Places or Polygons? Governmentality, Scale, and the Census in the Gay and Lesbian Atlas». Population, Space and Place, 12 (4), 223-242. < https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.410>
BROWN, Michael y KNOPP, Larry (2008). «Queering the Map: The Productive Tensions of Colliding Epistemologies». Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 98 (1), 40-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045600701734042
CIERI, Marie (2003). «Between Being and Looking Queer Tourism Promotion and Lesbian Social Space in Greater Philadelphia». ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 2 (2), 147-66. Disponible EN: https://www.acme-journal. org/index.php/acme/article/view/691
COPE, Meghan y ELWOOD, Sarah (2009). Qualitative GIS: A Mixed Methods Approach. SAGE.
COSGROVE, Denis E. (1984). Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape. London: Croom Helm.
CRAMPTON, Jeremy W. y KRYGIER, John (2005). «An Introduction to Critical Cartography». ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 4 (1), 11-33. Disponible en: https://www.acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/723
D’IGNAZIO, Catherine y KLEIN, Lauren F. (2016). «Feminist Data Visualization». IEEE Vis Conference.
DODGE, Martin y PERKINS, Chris (2008). «Reclaiming the map: British geography and ambivalent geographic practice». Environment and Planning A, 40 (6), 1271-1276. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4172
ENGLAND, Kim V. L. (1994). «Getting Personal: Reflexivity, Positionality, and Feminist Research». The Professional Geographer, 46 (1), 80-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00080.x
FONT-CASASECA, Núria (2016). «Mapas contra la injusticia urbana: la utopía pragmática de la Hull House en Chicago a finales del siglo xix». XIV Coloquio Internacional de Geocrítica. Las Utopias y La Construcción de La Sociedad Del Futuro, 2-7.
FOUCAULT, Michel (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977. Nueva York: Pantheon.
GARCIA RAMON, Maria Dolors (1989). «Género, espacio y entorno: ¿hacia una renovación conceptual de la geografía? Una introducción». Documents d’Anàlisi Geogràfica, 14, 7-13.
GIBSON-GRAHAM, Julie-Kathy (1994). «“Stuffed If I Know!”: Reflections on Post‐modern Feminist Social Research». Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 1 (2), 205-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/09663699408721210
GIESEKING, Jen Jack (2013). «Queering the Meaning of “Neighbourhood”: Reinterpreting the Lesbian-Queer Experience of Park Slope, Brooklyn, 1983-2008». En: Queer Presences and Absences, 178-200. Berlín: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137314352_10
GILBERT, Melissa R. (2005). «“Race”, Space, and Power: The Survival Strategies of Working Poor Women». En: LIN, J. y MELE, C. (eds.). (2013). The Urban Sociology Reader. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203103333
GLASER, Barney G.; STRAUSS, Anselm L. y STRUTZEL, Elizabeth (1968). «The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research». Nursing Research, 17 (4), 364. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014
HÄGERSTRAND, T. (1970). «What about People in Regional Science». Papers of the Regional Science Association, 24, 7-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01936872
HARAWAY, Donna (1988). «Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective». Feminist Studies, 14 (3), 575-599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
HARAWAY, Donna (1991). Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. Nueva York: Routledge.
HARRIS, Leila M. y HAZEN, Helen D. (2005). «Power of Maps: (Counter)Mapping for Conservation». ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 4 (1), 99-130. Disponible en: http://hdl.handle.net/2429/63618
HOGGART, Keith; LEES, Loretta y DAVIES, Anna (2002). Researching Human Geography. Londres: Arnold, A Member of the Hodder Headline Group.
KATZ, Cindi (1996). «Towards Minor Theory». Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 14 (4), 487-499. https://doi.org/10.1068/d140487
KATZ, Cindi (2001). «On the Grounds of Globalization: A Topography for Feminist Political Engagement». Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 26 (4), 1.213-1.234. https://doi.org/10.1086/495653
KNIGGE, LaDona y COPE, Meghan (2006). «Grounded Visualization: Integrating the Analysis of Qualitative and Quantitative Data through Grounded Theory and Visualization». Environment and Planning A, 38 (11), 2021-2037. https://doi.org/10.1068/a37327
KNIGGE, LaDona y COPE, Meghan (2009). «Grounded Visualization and Scale: A Recursive Analysis of Community Spaces». En: COPE, Meghan y ELWOOD, Sarah. Qualitative GIS: A Mixed Methods Approach. Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857024541.n6
KOBAYASHI, Audrey (1994). «Coloring the Field: Gender, “Race” and the Politics of Fieldwork». The Professional Geographer, 46 (1), 73-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00073.x
KOBAYASHI, Audrey (1997). «The Paradox of Difference and Diversity (or, Why the Threshold Keeps Moving)». En: Thresholds in Feminist Geography: Difference, Methodology, and Representation, 3-9. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
KWAN, Mei-Po (1999). «Gender and Individual Access to Urban Opportunities: A Study Using Space-Time Measures». The Professional Geographer, 51 (2), 211-227. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-0124.00158
KWAN, Mei-Po (2002a). «Is GIS for Women? Reflections on the Critical Discourse in the 1990s». Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 9 (3), 271-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369022000003888
KWAN, Mei-Po (2002b). «Feminist Visualization: Re-Envisioning GIS as a Method in Feminist Geographic Research». Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92 (4), 645-661. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8306.00309
KWAN, Mei-Po (2004). «Beyond Difference: From Canonical Geography to Hybrid Geographies». Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94 (4), 756-763.
KWAN, Mei-Po (2007). «Affecting Geospatial Technologies: Toward a Feminist Politics of Emotion». The Professional Geographer, 59 (1), 22-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9272.2007.00588.x
KWAN, Mei-Po (2008). «From Oral Histories to Visual Narratives: Re-Presenting the Post-September 11 Experiences of the Muslim Women in the USA». Social & Cultural Geography, 9 (6), 653-669. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360802292462
KWAN, Mei-Po y DING, Guoxiang (2008). «Geo-Narrative: Extending Geographic Information Systems for Narrative Analysis in Qualitative and Mixed-Method Research». The Professional Geographer, 60 (4), 443-465. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330120802211752
KWAN, Mei-Po y SCHWANEN, Tim (2016). «Geographies of Mobility». Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106 (2), 243-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2015.1123067
LESZCZYNSKI, Agnieszka (2009). «Quantitative Limits to Qualitative Engagements: GIS, Its Critics, and the Philosophical Divide». The Professional Geographer, 61 (3), 350-365. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330120902932026
MACEACHREN, A. M. y KRAAK, M. J. (2001). «Research Challenges in Geovisualization». Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 28 (1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1559/152304001782173970
MARTIN, Ron (2000). Editorial: In Memory of Maps, 25. Blackwell Publishing; The Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers).
MATTHEWS, Stephen A.; DETWILER, James E. y BURTON, Linda M. (2005). «Geo- Ethnography: Coupling Geographic Information Analysis Techniques with Ethnographic Methods in Urban Research». Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 40 (4), 75-90. https://doi.org/10.3138/2288-1450-w061-r664
MCLAFFERTY, Sara L. (1995). «Counting for Women». The Professional Geographer, 47 (4), 436-442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1995.00436.x
MCLAFFERTY, Sara L. (2010). «Mapping Women’s Worlds: Knowledge, Power and the Bounds of GIS». Gender, Place & Culture, 9 (3), 263-269. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369022000003879
MENNIS, Jeremy; MASON, Michael J. y CAO, Yinghui (2013). «Qualitative GIS and the Visualization of Narrative Activity Space Data». International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27 (2), 267-291. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2012.678362
MONK, Janice y GARCIA RAMON, Maria Dolors (1987). «Geografía feminista: una perspectiva internacional». Documents d’Anàlisi Geogràfica, 10, 147-157.
MONK, Janice y HANSON, Susan (1982). «On Not Excluding Half of the Human in Human Geography». The Professional Geographer, 34 (1), 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1982.00011.x
MOSS, Pamela (1995). «Embeddedness in Practice, Numbers in Context: The Politics of Knowing and Doing». The Professional Geographer, 47 (4), 442-449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1995.00442.x
NAST, Heidi J. (1998). «The body as ‘place’ Reflexivity and fieldwork in Kano, Nigeria». En: H. NAST, HEIDI J. y PILE, Steve (eds.). Places through the body. Londres: Routledge, 93-116.
PARKER, Brenda (2016a). «The Feminist Geographer as Killjoy: Excavating Gendered Urban Power Relations». The Professional Geographer, 69 (2), 321-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2016.1208513
PARKER, Brenda (2016b). «Feminist Forays in the City: Imbalance and Intervention in Urban Research Methods». Antipode, 48 (5), 1.337-1.358. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12241
PAVLOVSKAYA, Marianna (2002). «Mapping Urban Change and Changing GIS: Other Views of Economic Restructuring». Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 9 (3), 281-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369022000003897
PAVLOVSKAYA, Marianna (2004). «Other Transitions: Multiple Economies of Moscow Households in the 1990s». Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94 (2), 329-351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.09402011.x
PAVLOVSKAYA, Marianna (2006). «Theorizing with GIS: A Tool for Critical Geographies?». Environment and Planning A, 38 (11), 2003-2020. https://doi.org/10.1068/a37326
PAVLOVSKAYA, Marianna (2009a). «Feminist Visualization». En: KITCHIN, Rob y THRIFT, Nigel. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, 157-164. Oxford: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00556-3
PAVLOVSKAYA, Marianna (2009b). «Non-Quantitative GIS». En: COPE, Meghan y ELWOOD, Sarah. Qualitative GIS: A Mixed Methods Approach. Sage Publications Ltd.
PAVLOVSKAYA, Marianna y ST MARTIN, Kevin (2007). «Feminism and Geographic Information Systems: From a Missing Object to a Mapping Subject». Geography Compass, 1 (3), 583-606. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00028.x
PELUSO, Nancy Lee (1995). «Whose Woods Are These? Counter-Mapping Forest Territories in Kalimantan, Indonesia». Antipode, 27 (4), 383-406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.1995.tb00286.x
PICKLES, John (ed.) (1995). Ground Truth: The Social Implications of Geographic Information Systems. Nueva York: Guilford Press.
PICKLES, John (ed.) (2004). A History of Spaces : Cartographic Reason, Mapping, and the Geo-Coded World. London [etc.]: Routledge.
PRESTON, Bryan y WILSON Matthew W. (2014). «Practicing GIS as Mixed Method: Affordances and Limitations in an Urban Gardening Study». Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104 (3), 510-529. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2014.892325
RAISZ, Erwin (1948). General Cartography. 2ª ed. Nueva York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
ROCHELEAU, Dianne (1995). «Maps, Numbers, Text, and Context: Mixing Methods in Feminist Political Ecology». The Professional Geographer, 47 (4), 458-466.
ROSE, Damaris (1993). «On Feminism, Method and Methods in Human Geography: An Idiosyncratic Overview». The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien, 37 (1), 57-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0064.1993.tb01543.x
ROSE, Gillian (1993). Feminism and Geography : The Limits of Geographical Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
ROSE, Gillian (2003). «On the Need to Ask How, Exactly, Is Geography “Visual”?». Antipode, 35 (2), 212-221. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00317
ROSE, Gillian (2011). Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials. Londres: SAGE Publications Limited.
SAID, Edward (1978). Orientalism: Western Representations of the Orient. Nueva York: Pantheon.
SAUER, Carl O. (1956). «The Education of a Geographer». Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 46 (3), 287-299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1956.tb01510.x
SCHOEPFER, Isabelle y ROGERS, Stephanie R. (2014). «A New Qualitative GIS Method for Investigating Neighbourhood Characteristics Using a Tablet». Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 49 (2), 127-143. https://doi.org/10.3138/carto.49.2.1810
SCHUURMAN, Nadine (2000). «Trouble in the Heartland: GIS and Its Critics in the 1990s». Progress in Human Geography, 24 (4), 569-590. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913200100189111
SCHUURMAN, Nadine (2002). «Women and Technology in Geography: A Cyborg Manifesto for GIS. (Focus: Equity for Women in Geography)». The Canadian Geographer, 46 (3), 258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0064.2002.tb00748.x
SEAGER, Joni (2001). Atlas del Estado de la Mujer en el Mundo. Madrid: Ediciones Akal.
SEAGER, Joni (2018). La Mujer en el Mundo. Atlas de la Geografía Feminista. Barcelona: Grijalbo.
SHEPPARD, Eric; COUCLELIS, Helen; GRAHAM, Stephen; HARRINGTON, J. W. y ONSRUD, Harlan (1999). «Geographies of the Information Society». International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 13 (8), 797-823. https://doi.org/10.1080/136588199241021
SMITH, Neil (1979). «Geography, Science and Post-Positivist Modes of Explanation». Progress in Geography, 3 (3), 356-383. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913257900300302
SUCHAN, Trudy A. y BREWER, Cynthia A. (2000). «Qualitative Methods for Research on Mapmaking and Map Use». The Professional Geographer, 52 (1), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-0124.00212
THATCHER, Jim; BERGMANN, Luke; RICKER, Britta; ROSE-REDWOOD, Reuben; O’SULLIVAN, David; BARNES, Trevor J.; BARNESMOORE, Luke R. et al. (2015). «Revisiting Critical GIS». Environment and Planning A, 48 (5). https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X15622208
VAIOU, Dina y LYKOGIANNI, Rouli (2006). «Women, Neighbourhoods and Everyday Life». Urban Studies, 43 (4), 731-743. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980600597434
VALENTINE, Gill (2007). «Theorizing and Researching Intersectionality: A Challenge for Feminist Geography». The Professional Geographer, 59 (1), 10-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9272.2007.00587.x
VALENTINE, Gill y SADGROVE, Joanna (2012). «Lived Difference: A Narrative Account of Spatiotemporal Processes of Social Differentiation». Environment and Planning A, 44 (9), 2.049-2.063. https://doi.org/10.1068/a44491
VERD, Joan Miquel y PORCEL, Sergio (2012). «An Application of Qualitative Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in the Field of Urban Sociology Using ATLAS. Ti: Uses and Reflections». Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13 (2). http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-13.2.1847
WATTS, Paul R. (2010). «Mapping Narratives: The 1992 Los Angeles Riots as a Case Study for Narrative-Based Geovisualization». Journal of Cultural Geography, 27 (2), 203-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/08873631.2010.494401
WERNER, Marion; STRAUSS, Kendra; PARKER, Brenda; ORZECK, Reecia; DRISCOLL DERICKSON, Kate y BONDS, Anne (2017). «Feminist Political Economy in Geography: Why Now, What Is Different, and What For?». Geoforum, 79, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.11.013
Publicado
Cómo citar
Descargas
Derechos de autor 2020 Núria Font-Casaseca
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.